A blog which periodically revisits evergreen investment principles!

Category: Equity Page 1 of 2

The obsession of Private Equity players in buying out Indian Hospital Chains 


The overall Healthcare sector, specially Hospital industry has continuously seen rise in acquisitions with various deals by private equity firms. More and more hospital chains are acquired by foreign private equity firms.  

Why there is so much surge of deals in India’s healthcare sector. These private equities firms own majority stake in some of the hospital chains. What it means for patients ? 

Let us first try to understand what a private equity firm is ? 

Private equity (PE) is a form of equity capital that prefers investing in fast paced growth companies at an early stage predominantly in unlisted companies. Private equity has several characteristics that distinguish it from other forms of investment. Some of this includes Long term investments, illiquidity, high expected returns, active management, exit strategies etc. These characteristics make private equity a special and often lucrative form of investment, but one that is also associated with considerable risks and challenges.  

Deals in Private equity 

As per various sources, Year 2023 alone saw PE firms investing $ 5.5 Bn in Indian Healthcare industry. Some of the past acquisitions include : 

* Acquired by Radiant Life Care owned by KKR 

The PE firms provide a fresh air of capital infusion for hospital chains to expand rapidly, open new facilities as well as upgrade the existing facilities. The strategy adopted by PE firms is such that they like to take control of company’s operations and management. They seek out companies with high growth potential or those needing significant operational improvements. Once they find suitable investment, they inject fresh capital. The goal of the PE firm is to increase the value of the company usually between 5-7 year period.  

After enhancing company’s performance and growth, the PE firm will eventually sell its stake through various exit strategies by way of sale to another company or through public offering (IPO). Typically the PE firm do not stay for long term.  

Hospital bed per 1000 population is a metric often used to assess access to healthcare facilities in the country. India has 0.60 hospital bed per 1000 population as per the ministry of health in 2021. In contrast studies indicate 3 hospital bed per 1000 population is close to idle. This means there is a huge gap in access to healthcare services in India there aren’t enough hospitals or medical professionals in the system to take care of India’s rising population. This gap was one of the major reason why our healthcare system literally collapsed during covid pandemic. PE deals in Indian Healthcare space has actually shot up after pandemic 

Below chart highlights PE investment in Indian Healthcare space annually since Year 2020  

Source : Bain Capital 

Global investors are seeing the gap in Indian healthcare infrastructure as an opportunity for them. Also with rising bill of surgeries, insurance penetration and lifestyle chronic disease – all this factors are expected to boost hospital revenues. 

The top 10 healthcare chains in India on the private side would still account for less than 5% of total hospital beds, resulting into a fragmented industry. While large chains are growing faster, there is still a huge runway for inorganic growth.  

Impact on the industry :  

The immediate impact is the rapid expansion of this chains with fresh inflow of funds. The hospitals are able to open new facilities and upgrade their existing facilities to enhance the services provided. However PE Firms are here for quick spurt of growth where they can actually make profit and exit. However this may not board well for patients as PE firms focusses on profit with emphasis on maximising returns leading to higher healthcare costs. PE firms have bad track record in international healthcare industry including USA. Some of the same PE firms are buying out hospitals in India. 

Based on global hospital industry phenomenon, these hospital chains have set such high standards of protocols that small hospitals won’t be able to meet. Eventually, the micro health system will vanish and only the large corporate chains will be left. Ultimately the burden shall fall on the patients. Many often patients suggest that once a hospital chain is acquired by these PE firms their hospital bill has gone up by 15-20% including consultation fees.  

On the other hand increasing PE in Indian healthcare could also mean that India can become better integrated with global healthcare industry, and become a regional/global hub for quality medical care, medical tourism related opportunities etc. If anything goes south with Indian healthcare/hospitals, PEs alone will surely not be the reason for it. PEs only respond to ‘market opportunities’ and maximize their returns.  

Performance improvement and Exits :  

CVC Capital made investment in Healthcare global in 2020 since then the cash flow from operations has jumped to ~ Rs 300 Crs from being less than Rs 100 Crs, market cap since 2020 has more than doubled. Similarly Max Healthcare has seen its market cap rise by 5x since 2018 when KKR alongwith Radiant invested Rs 2100 Crs for 49% stake. EBITDA Margins for Max Healthcare improved from ~10% in FY19 to 27% in FY23. Care hospitals saw its EBITDA rise from Rs 98 Crs in FY18 to Rs 323 Crs in FY23.

One of the most successful exits in Hospital space was KKR cashing out 5x returns when it exited Max Hospitals in 2022 in just 4 years timeframe, the most lucrative since the PE firm started investing in healthcare space. Other notable exits in the space include Carlyle exiting Medanta, Everstone exiting Sahyadri Hospitals etc 

References: 

FOF talk on Overview of Hospital Industry in India – https://youtu.be/6_CWubvfQVU?si=-pHqufIytXHYZa6Z 

What powers the world of Moneylanders?

The Oracle of Omaha once wrote, “It has been far safer to steal large sums with a pen than small sums with a gun” (1988 Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders).

This statement rings loud and clear in an era where entrepreneurs have amassed humongous amounts of illicit wealth by siphoning off shareholders’ money or diverting proceeds from lenders for personal purposes, leaving no distinction between corporate net worth and their own. 

The greed for a lavish life, the desire to meet analysts’ quarterly expectations, to drive up the stock price (they benefit from stock options) makes corporate frauds an endless battle to fight against.

Howard Schilit in his book, ‘Financial Shenanigans’ has very well illuminated the multiple ways by which it is highly possible to dress the financial results and manipulate numbers and stock price.

Tweaks to our investing framework

The headline first.

There is no change to the basics of our investing approach.”

Our investing approach consists of

  • Investing only with Promoters / Managers who have the best interests of shareholders at heart and who are competent in the business that they run.
  • Investing in businesses where the underlying characteristics are good. These are, limited competition and pricing power which ultimately is shown by high return on capital employed.
  • Limited use of leverage in the non banking / financial businesses we own.
  • A good potential for growing the business is usually a positive provided it can be done in a capital efficient manner.
  • Buying at attractive valuations.

Investors who do not care for the nuances may ignore this post completely.

Do companies get the shareholders they deserve?

Traditional Textbook Economics has the point of view of maximising utility. It means that each individual’s action in the economy is based on the expectation that they will make the maximum possible gain from a transaction. Whereas, behavioural economics has taught us, painfully, that we may not always be doing this well. We may set out with the best intentions of maximum gain but many times our actions fall short of the goal.

It is not the final action, but the motivation underlying the action, that decides what is or is not viewed as cooperative or fair behaviour.
– Games Indians Play by V Raghunathan

Mistakes were made…

It’s always difficult to deal with mistakes even if they teach us the most about who we are & how we think. While running a diversified portfolio few one-off mistakes do get absorbed in the longer run but the mistakes still hurt.

from The New Yorker Magazine

Page 1 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén